Your board meeting is in two weeks.

You need to report on marketing performance.

You pull up Google Analytics. Pageviews are up 40%. Time on site increased. Bounce rate improved.

You present these metrics.

The CEO asks: "Great, but how much pipeline did the website generate?"

You have no idea.

This happens at every B2B SaaS company. CMOs report vanity metrics because they don't know what the board actually cares about.

Let me fix that.

I'm going to show you the exact website metrics investors and board members care about. Not traffic stats. Not engagement rates. Business metrics that tie directly to revenue and growth.

These are the numbers that keep your board seat safe.

‍

Your board doesn't care about traffic, they care about revenue contribution

Here's the fundamental misunderstanding:

CMOs think boards want to see marketing activity metrics. Traffic. Engagement. Brand awareness.

Boards want to see revenue metrics. Pipeline contribution. CAC efficiency. Payback periods.

Your website is a revenue channel, not a content library.

Every metric you report should connect to one of three things: pipeline generation, conversion efficiency, or customer acquisition cost.

If a metric doesn't tie to one of these, don't report it.

"Pageviews up 40%" means nothing unless it correlates with more qualified pipeline.

"Bounce rate improved from 65% to 52%" is interesting only if it means more demos booked.

The board is evaluating: Is marketing efficiently generating qualified pipeline? Is the website pulling its weight as a revenue channel? Are we spending customer acquisition dollars wisely?

Answer those questions with data, and you'll never have an awkward board meeting again.

‍

Metric 1: Website-Influenced Pipeline (Not Just Website-Sourced)

This is the most important metric. And most CMOs report it wrong.

Website-sourced pipeline: Leads who first touched your company through the website and later became pipeline.

Website-influenced pipeline: All opportunities where the website played any role in the buyer journey.

The difference matters enormously.

Example: Someone attends your webinar (sourced as "webinar"). Later visits website, reads 3 case studies, checks pricing, then books demo. Demo converts to $100K opportunity.

Website-sourced: $0. Website-influenced: $100K.

Your website probably influences 60-80% of pipeline even when it's not the "source." But if you only report sourced, you're drastically understating impact.

How to calculate:

• Pull all closed/won and open pipeline from CRM
• Identify which contacts/accounts visited website before opportunity created
• Tag those opportunities as website-influenced
• Sum total value

Report it like this:

"Website influenced $2.4M of the $3.1M in pipeline created this quarter (77%). Of that, $800K was website-sourced (first touch). Average deal size for website-influenced deals: $48K vs $32K for non-influenced."

This shows the website's actual revenue contribution. Not just form fills.

Most marketing automation platforms (HubSpot, Marketo, Pardot) can track this with proper attribution setup. If yours can't, you're using the wrong tool.

‍

Metric 2: Website Conversion Rate by Funnel Stage

Board members want to know if your website is getting more efficient over time.

One number isn't enough. You need conversion by stage:

Visitor → Lead (top of funnel)

Total website visitors / leads generated

Target: 3-5% for B2B SaaS

Lead → MQL (qualification)

Leads generated / marketing qualified leads

Target: 40-60%

MQL → SQL (sales accepted)

MQLs / sales qualified leads

Target: 50-70%

SQL → Opportunity (pipeline)

SQLs / opportunities created

Target: 30-50%

Why track all stages? Because it tells you where the breakdown is.

If visitor → lead is 2%, your traffic quality or conversion optimization needs work.

If lead → MQL is 25%, you're generating junk leads. Traffic targeting or qualification criteria needs fixing.

If MQL → SQL is 80% but SQL → Opp is 15%, sales doesn't believe marketing's leads are qualified.

Report it like this:

"Website conversion funnel: Visitor to lead improved from 2.8% to 3.6% (+29%). Lead to MQL steady at 55%. MQL to SQL improved from 48% to 61% (+27%) after implementing new lead scoring. Overall visitor to opportunity conversion: 0.9%, up from 0.6% last quarter."

This shows you're optimizing systematically, not just throwing traffic at the wall.

‍

Metric 3: CAC by Channel (With Website Broken Out)

Your board is obsessed with CAC. As they should be.

Most CMOs report blended CAC across all channels. That hides problems.

You need CAC by channel:

• Organic search
• Paid search
• Paid social
• Content/SEO
• Direct traffic
• Referral

Why? Because if your blended CAC is $8K but paid search is $18K and organic is $2K, you need to know that.

How to calculate:(All marketing spend attributed to channel) / (New customers from channel)

Include: Ad spend, tool costs, content creation, agency fees, headcount allocation.

Report it like this:

"Blended website CAC: $6,200 (-15% from last quarter). Breakdown: Organic search: $2,100. Paid search: $14,800. Paid social: $11,200. Direct: $3,400. Paid channels above target, driving investment shift to SEO and conversion optimization."

This tells the board where to invest more and where to cut back.

One caveat: Make sure your attribution model is consistent quarter over quarter. Don't change how you calculate mid-year or trends become meaningless.

‍

Metric 4: Payback Period (Website-Sourced vs Other Channels)

CAC is only half the story. Payback period is the other half.

Payback period = How long to recover customer acquisition cost from revenue.

Formula: CAC / (Monthly Recurring Revenue × Gross Margin %)

Example: CAC is $6K, customer pays $500/month, gross margin is 80%.Payback = $6,000 / ($500 × 0.80) = 15 months

Boards love payback period under 12 months. Tolerate up to 18 months. Get nervous above 24 months.

Why track for website specifically? Because it's often your most efficient channel.

If your website payback is 9 months but events are 22 months, that changes budget allocation decisions dramatically.

Report it like this:

"Website-sourced customer payback period: 11 months (target: <12). Down from 14 months last quarter due to improved conversion rates and slightly higher ACV. Paid search: 19 months. Organic: 8 months. Overall blended: 13 months."

This shows capital efficiency. Boards obsess over this, especially in tighter funding environments.

‍

Metric 5: Traffic Quality Score (Not Just Volume)

Traffic is up 40%. Cool. But is it quality traffic?

Most CMOs report traffic volume. Smart CMOs report traffic quality.

Traffic quality = % of visitors matching your ICP criteria

How to measure:

• Set up firmographic filters in your analytics (company size, industry, job title, geography)
• Track what % of traffic matches ICP
• Compare quality score to conversion rates

You'll usually find: quality traffic converts 5-10x better than non-ICP traffic.

Report it like this:

"Total website traffic: 45K visitors (+18% QoQ). ICP-qualified traffic: 22K visitors (49% of total, +31% QoQ). Non-ICP: 23K (42% of total, +8% QoQ). ICP traffic converts to demo at 8.4% vs 1.2% for non-ICP. Focus: driving more qualified traffic through targeted content and paid campaigns."

This shows you're not just buying clicks. You're attracting the right buyers.

Tools that help: Clearbit Reveal, 6sense, Demandbase, Factors.ai. They identify companies visiting your site even without form fills.

‍

Metric 6: Content Performance by Revenue Impact

Your blog has 50 posts. Which ones actually drive pipeline?

Most CMOs report: "Blog traffic up 60%. 8 new posts published."

Boards don't care. They want to know: which content generates revenue?

How to track:

• Tag content URLs in your CRM/MA platform
• Track which blog posts or resources were consumed before opportunity creation
• Calculate pipeline influenced by each asset
• Identify top performers and patterns

Report it like this:

"Content influenced $1.8M in pipeline this quarter. Top performers: 'ROI Calculator' influenced $420K across 12 deals. 'Enterprise Security Guide' influenced $380K across 5 deals. 'vs Competitor' comparison pages influenced $290K across 8 deals. Learning: Bottom-funnel, high-intent content drives disproportionate pipeline. Shifting content strategy accordingly."

This proves content marketing ROI. And shows you're optimizing based on revenue impact, not vanity metrics.

Stop reporting posts published. Start reporting pipeline influenced.

‍

Metric 7: Demo/Trial Request Quality and Conversion Rate

Getting demo requests is good. Getting qualified demo requests that convert is better.

Track two things:

Demo request volume and quality

• Total demo requests
• % that meet ICP criteria
• % that show (show rate)
• % that convert to opportunity (conversion rate)

Trial signup quality (if PLG)

• Total signups
• % that activate (complete onboarding)
• % that convert to paid
• Time to conversion

Report it like this:

"Demo requests: 147 (+23% QoQ). ICP match rate: 68% (vs 54% last quarter). Show rate: 82%. Demo to opportunity conversion: 44%. Trial signups: 890 (+15%). Activation rate: 47% (target: >50%). Trial to paid conversion: 9.2% (improved from 7.8%). Focus: improving activation through product tours and better onboarding."

This shows you're not just generating volume. You're generating quality that sales can close.

If demo no-show rate is over 30% or conversion rate is under 30%, you have a lead quality problem. Fix targeting.

‍

Metric 8: Website Load Time and Performance Impact

Slow websites kill conversion. Your board needs to know if this is a problem.

Track:

• Average page load time (target: <2 seconds)
• Largest Contentful Paint / LCP (target: <2.5s)
• Core Web Vitals scores
• Conversion rate correlation with load time

Why boards care: Every second of delay costs roughly 7% of conversions. That directly impacts pipeline.

If your site loads in 5 seconds instead of 2, you're losing 21% of potential conversions. On $2M pipeline, that's $420K left on the table.

Report it like this:

"Website performance: Average load time 1.8s (within target <2s). LCP improved from 3.1s to 2.2s after image optimization. Core Web Vitals: 'Good' on 89% of page views (up from 76%). Performance improvement correlated with 18% increase in conversion rate. Continuing optimization work on slower product pages."

This shows technical excellence and revenue impact.

Use Google PageSpeed Insights or tools like Lighthouse to measure. Connect performance to conversion in your analytics.

Metric 9: Mobile vs Desktop Performance Gap

54% of B2B traffic is mobile now. If your mobile experience sucks, you're losing half your pipeline.

Track:

• Traffic split (mobile vs desktop)
• Conversion rate by device
• Performance gaps

Most SaaS websites have terrible mobile conversion. Desktop converts at 4%, mobile at 1.5%. That's a huge revenue leak.

Report it like this:

"Traffic: 56% mobile, 44% desktop. Conversion rates: Desktop 4.2%, mobile 2.1% (50% gap). Pipeline influenced: Desktop $1.4M, mobile $600K. Mobile optimization priority: reduced gap from 65% to 50% this quarter through mobile-first redesign. Target: close gap to <20% by Q3."

This shows you understand where revenue is leaking and have a plan to fix it.

Boards hate unfixed problems. Show progress on closing gaps.

Metric 10: Competitor Comparison Page Performance

If you have "vs Competitor" pages, track their impact.

These pages are extremely high-intent. Someone comparing you to a competitor is close to buying.

Track:

• Traffic to comparison pages
• Conversion rate (usually 2-3x higher than homepage)
• Pipeline influenced
• Win rate for deals where prospect visited comparison page

Report it like this:

"Competitor comparison pages: 3,400 visits this quarter. Conversion to demo: 11.2% (vs 3.8% site average). Pipeline influenced: $480K across 9 opportunities. Win rate on these deals: 67% (vs 42% overall). Expanding comparison content to cover 3 more competitors by end of quarter."

This shows strategic thinking. You're creating content that influences deals at critical decision moments.

Most companies neglect comparison pages. Smart companies make them conversion powerhouses.

‍

Metric 11: Website Attribution Accuracy and Coverage

Here's an uncomfortable truth: Your attribution is probably wrong.

Most CMOs report attribution data without disclosing how much of their pipeline has unknown source.

You need to report coverage:

• % of pipeline with known attribution
• % marked as "unknown" or "direct"
• Efforts to improve attribution accuracy

If 40% of your pipeline is marked "unknown source," your other metrics are questionable.

Report it like this:

"Attribution coverage: 78% of pipeline has identified source (up from 68% last quarter). Remaining 22% split between: Direct traffic (12%), unknown source (10%). Improvements: Implemented UTM parameter standards, added Clearbit enrichment, improved CRM-to-website tracking. Target: 85% coverage by Q3."

This shows honesty and systematic improvement.

Boards respect CMOs who acknowledge measurement gaps and fix them. They distrust CMOs who pretend attribution is perfect.

‍

Metric 12: Year-Over-Year Efficiency Trends

Your board wants to know: Is marketing getting more efficient over time?

They care about trajectory, not just current state.

Track YoY:

• CAC trend (should decrease or stay flat)
• Conversion rate trend (should increase)
• Payback period trend (should decrease)
• Pipeline per marketing dollar (should increase)

Report it like this:

"YoY marketing efficiency improvements: CAC decreased 18% ($7,200 → $5,900). Website conversion rate increased 42% (2.8% → 4.0%). Payback period decreased from 16 months to 11 months. Pipeline per marketing dollar: $4.20 (up from $2.80). Efficiency gains driven by: improved conversion optimization, better traffic targeting, and content that converts."

This is the money slide. Shows you're not just spending more to get more. You're getting smarter.

Boards love efficiency improvements. They fund CMOs who prove systematic improvement over time.

‍

How to Actually Present This (Without 47 Slides)

Don't report all 12 metrics every board meeting. You'll lose them.

Create a one-page dashboard with 5-6 key metrics. Rotate which ones based on what's most important that quarter.

Standard quarterly dashboard:

1. Website-influenced pipeline ($X, X% of total)
2. Conversion rate trend (X% this quarter, +X% QoQ)
3. CAC by channel (blended $X, breakdown by top 3 channels)
4. Payback period (X months, trend)
5. Content/campaign highlight (top performer, pipeline influenced)
6. Key initiative update (what you're optimizing next)

That's it. One page. Six metrics. Five minutes to present.

Then have backup slides with deeper detail if they ask questions.

Most boards won't ask. They just want to know: Is marketing efficiently generating pipeline? Is it getting better? What are you fixing next?

Answer those three questions clearly and you're golden.

‍

The Metrics You Should Stop Reporting

While we're here, let's talk about what not to report:

Pageviews: Nobody cares. Unless you're ad-supported, pageviews don't matter.

Time on site: Meaningless. People can spend 5 minutes and bounce or 30 seconds and convert.

Bounce rate: Only matters if correlated with conversion rate change. Otherwise it's trivia.

Email open rates: Vanity metric. Clicks and conversions matter.

Social media followers: Unless you're B2C, this is noise.

Blog post count: Quantity doesn't matter. Revenue impact does.

Generic engagement metrics: "Engagement up 40%" means nothing without defining engagement and connecting to revenue.

If you can't connect a metric to pipeline, CAC, or payback period, don't put it in a board deck.

Your CEO and board have limited attention. Don't waste it on metrics that don't matter.

‍

What Good Actually Looks Like

Let me show you a real example (numbers changed, company anonymous).

Slide title: Website Marketing Performance Q2 2024

Pipeline Contribution

• Website influenced: $4.2M of $5.8M total pipeline (72%)
• Website sourced: $1.8M (31%)
• Average deal size: $52K (website-influenced) vs $38K (other channels)

Conversion Efficiency

• Visitor to lead: 4.1% (+0.7pp QoQ)
• Lead to opportunity: 1.2% (+0.3pp QoQ)
• Overall visitor to pipeline conversion improved 38% YoY

Customer Acquisition

• Blended CAC: $5,400 (-12% QoQ)
• Website payback period: 10 months (target: <12)
• Organic search CAC: $1,900 (continuing investment)

Key Initiatives

• Launched 3 competitor comparison pages → $380K influenced pipeline
• Mobile optimization reduced desktop/mobile conversion gap from 65% to 42%
• New demo qualification criteria improved show rate from 76% to 84%

Q3 Focus

• Improve MQL to SQL conversion (currently 58%, target 70%)
• Expand bottom-funnel content (buying guides, ROI calculators)
• Further mobile optimization (target <20% conversion gap)

That's it. One slide or page. Everything the board needs to know.

Shows impact. Shows efficiency. Shows you're optimizing systematically.

This CMO's job is safe.

‍

Build Your Dashboard This Week

You have real work to do. Don't put this off.

Here's your action plan:

Day 1: Audit current reporting. What metrics are you showing the board? How many actually tie to revenue?

Day 2: Set up attribution tracking properly. Make sure your CRM and website analytics talk to each other. Tag opportunities with website influence.

Day 3: Build conversion funnel tracking. Visitor → Lead → MQL → SQL → Opportunity. Get baseline numbers.

Day 4: Calculate CAC by channel. Include all costs. Be honest about the numbers.

Day 5: Create your one-page dashboard. Pick 5-6 metrics that matter. Build it in a spreadsheet or tool you'll actually update.

Day 6: Share with your CEO. Get alignment on what matters before the board meeting.

Day 7: Practice presenting. Five minutes. Clear narrative. Revenue focus.

One week. Then you're ready for every board meeting.

Most CMOs never do this work. They keep reporting pageviews and hoping nobody asks hard questions.

Don't be most CMOs.