.jpg)

You're building a SaaS product.
You need to decide: Do we let people try the product first? Or do we make them talk to sales?
Product-led growth (PLG) or sales-led?
This isn't just a go-to-market decision. It fundamentally changes how your website should work.
I've built websites for both motions. Companies that do PLG wrong look desperate. Companies that do sales-led wrong create unnecessary friction.
The strategies are different. The websites must be different.
Let me show you exactly what changes.
Product-led growth (PLG):Product is the primary vehicle for customer acquisition, activation, and expansion. Users try before they buy. Self-serve signup. Minimal sales involvement. Low friction to start.
Think: Slack, Zoom, Notion, Figma, Calendly.
Sales-led growth (SLG):Sales team is the primary vehicle for customer acquisition. Demos before trials. Human interaction required. Higher friction, but qualified buyers. Custom solutions.
Think: Salesforce, Workday, SAP, ServiceNow.
This choice affects every single website element:
Your homepage messaging. Call-to-action strategy. Pricing transparency. Form fields. Navigation structure. Content strategy. Conversion metrics.
Everything.
Most companies try to do both halfway. Result: Neither works well.
Let me show you what each motion requires.
PLG homepage hero:
Goal: Get user into product immediately.
Headline: Clear value prop focused on user benefit. "Video meetings that actually work. No downloads, no hassles."
Subheadline: Immediate value and ease. "Create your first meeting in 30 seconds. Free for unlimited 1-on-1 calls."
Primary CTA: Direct product action. "Start Meeting Now" or "Sign Up Free"
Secondary CTA: Optional education. "See How It Works" (2-min video)
Social proof: User count or everyday company logos. "Trusted by 2M+ professionals at companies like [mid-market logos]"
Visual: Product in use, showing simplicity.
No form: Just click to start.
Example: Loom. "Record quick videos to replace meetings." CTA: "Get Loom for Free". Instant signup. No demo request. No sales call.
Sales-led homepage hero:
Goal: Qualify prospect and get them on sales call.
Headline: Clear value prop focused on business outcome. "Enterprise resource planning that scales with your business. From $10M to $10B."
Subheadline: Enterprise credibility and complexity. "Unified platform for finance, supply chain, HR, and operations. Built for complex organizations."
Primary CTA: Human interaction. "Request Demo" or "Talk to Sales"
Secondary CTA: Qualification path. "See Customer Stories" or "Download Buyer's Guide"
Social proof: Enterprise logos and scale indicators. "Trusted by 50 of the Fortune 100"
Visual: Dashboard showing scale and complexity.
Form required: Contact info to proceed.
Example: NetSuite. "The leading cloud business management suite." CTA: "Request a Demo". Form with company size and industry. Sales team follows up.
Same product category (business software). Completely different approach based on GTM motion.
PLG CTAs:
Primary: "Start Free Trial" / "Sign Up Free" / "Try It Now"
Placement:
Frequency: 5-7 CTAs on homepage. Multiple opportunities to self-serve.
No phone number in header. You're optimizing for self-service, not calls.
PLG CTA copy examples:
Remove all friction. Make starting trivial.
Sales-led CTAs:
Primary: "Request Demo" / "Talk to Sales" / "Contact Us"
Placement:
Frequency: 2-3 CTAs on homepage. Too many feels desperate. You want qualified conversations, not volume.
Phone number in header. Shows you value human interaction.
Sales-led CTA copy examples:
Set expectation: This requires conversation.
The hybrid trap:
Don't put both "Start Free Trial" AND "Request Demo" as equal-weight CTAs on same page.
Confusing. Which should I do?
If you offer both, make one primary:
Pick your motion. Design for it.
PLG pricing page:
Fully transparent pricing.
Show all tiers with exact prices. Monthly and annual costs. Feature comparison. No "contact us" for any tier.
Why? Self-serve requires self-service. Can't decide without knowing cost.
Structure:
Each tier shows:
Bottom of page:
Example: Notion pricing. Free, Plus ($10/user), Business ($18/user), Enterprise (Contact Sales).
All prices visible. Start any tier immediately.
Sales-led pricing page:
Limited or no price transparency.
Options:
Why? Complex pricing based on: Company size, modules needed, implementation scope, support level, contract length.
You can't show accurate pricing without qualification.
Structure:
What to include:
Example: Workday pricing. No prices shown. "Contact us to discuss your needs."
Form asks: company size, industry, which modules.
Sales team provides custom quote.
The middle ground:
Some companies show starting prices to set expectations:
"Plans starting at $99/user/month for teams of 10+"
Then: "Final pricing based on: [factors]"
This works for: Mid-market SaaS with simple-to-complex options.
Gives ballpark without misleading.
PLG forms:
Minimize fields ruthlessly.
Signup form:
That's it. 2-3 fields.
Everything else collected later:
Why? Every field drops conversion 10-20%.
Going from 2 fields to 5 fields = 50%+ drop in signups.
You want volume. Qualify later in-product or via usage data.
Example: Canva signup. Email or Google/Facebook login. Done.
You're in the product in 10 seconds.
Sales-led forms:
More fields to qualify.
Demo request form:
That's 7-9 fields.
Why? You need to qualify before dedicating sales time.
High-value enterprise deals justify higher friction.
And serious buyers will fill it out. Tire-kickers bounce.
That's fine. You want quality over quantity.
Example: Salesforce demo request.8 fields including company size, industry, role.
Routes to appropriate sales rep based on info.
The data:
PLG: 2-field forms convert at 15-25%Sales-led: 8-field forms convert at 3-8%
Different goals. Different metrics.
PLG: Optimize for signups → activation → conversion
Sales-led: Optimize for qualified leads → demos → pipeline
Navigation structure and information architecture
PLG navigation:
Product-centric. Easy access to trial.
Typical structure:[Product] [Use Cases] [Pricing] [Resources] [Login] [Sign Up Free]
"Sign Up" is visually prominent. Often a button, not text link.
Resources include: Help center, templates, community, tutorials.
Self-service support is critical.
No "Solutions" dropdown. Too enterprise-y for PLG.
No "Request Demo" in nav. Not the primary path.
Keep it simple. Guide to product.
Sales-led navigation:
Solution-centric. Guide to conversation.
Typical structure:[Products ▼] [Solutions ▼] [Customers] [Resources] [Company] [Contact Sales]
Products dropdown: Different modules/products.
Solutions dropdown: By industry, role, company size.
More complex. Reflects complex sale.
Resources include: Case studies, whitepapers, webinars, ROI calculators.
Education-heavy. Long sales cycle.
No "Start Trial" in nav. If you offer trial, it comes after sales conversation.
Guide to qualification, not product.
The mobile difference:
PLG mobile nav: "Sign Up" is top item. Immediate action.
Sales-led mobile nav: "Request Demo" prominent but not overwhelming.
Mobile behavior differs by motion.
PLG users might sign up on mobile.
Sales-led buyers research on mobile, convert on desktop.
PLG content:
Goal: Self-education. Remove barriers to adoption.
Content types:
Product tutorials: "How to create your first project", "5-minute getting started guide", Video walkthroughs of features.
Gets users to value fast.
Use case templates: Pre-built templates users can copy. "Social media calendar template", "Sprint planning template"
Reduces activation friction.
Best practices:"10 ways to use [product]" Tips from power users.
Shows depth without overwhelming new users.
Community content: User-generated templates. Forum discussions. User showcases.
Builds engagement and retention.
Integration guides: How to connect to other tools. API documentation. Automation recipes.
Expands value through ecosystem.
Example: Airtable content hub. Templates, guides, case studies, community showcase.
All designed to help users get value themselves.
Sales-led content:
Goal: Educate buyers. Support evaluation. Build credibility.
Content types:
Industry reports: "State of [Industry] 2024","Benchmark report: [Metric]"
Establishes thought leadership.
Buyer's guides: "How to evaluate [category]", "RFP template for [solution]"
Helps procurement process. Positions you as trusted advisor.
ROI calculators: Interactive tools showing potential value. TCO comparisons vs competitors.
Quantifies business case.
Enterprise case studies: Detailed implementation stories. Business outcomes with metrics. Executive testimonials.
Proves capability at scale.
Technical whitepapers: Architecture details. Security documentation. Integration capabilities.
For technical evaluation.
Example: Salesforce resource center. Research reports, implementation guides, customer success stories, admin certification.
Supports long complex sales cycle.
PLG: Usually free tier or generous free trial
Free tier option (freemium):
Examples: Slack (10K messages), Notion (individual use), Figma (3 files).
Best for: Products with network effects. Value increases with users. Low marginal cost to serve free users.
Generous free trial:
Examples: Superhuman (30 days), Webflow (14 days), HubSpot (free tools + trial).
Best for: Products where value is obvious quickly. Lower network effects. Want paying customers fast.
The goal: Get users to experience value. Convert based on that experience.
Sales-led: No free tier, controlled trials
No self-serve trial option: Just "Request Demo."
Trial comes after sales conversation and qualification.
Best for: Complex products requiring setup. High-touch implementation. Enterprise buyers who expect sales process.
Controlled trial/pilot: Sales team sets up trial after qualification.30-60 day pilot with specific success criteria. Sales team involved throughout.
Best for: Products requiring configuration. Proving ROI before full rollout.
Why no free tier for sales-led:
Free users aren't qualified buyers. They waste resources without sales interaction. Enterprise buyers don't expect free tier. You're selling business value, not freemium product.
Example: Workday, SAP, Oracle. No free tier. No self-serve trial. 100% sales-led evaluation.
PLG onboarding:
Goal: Get to "aha moment" fast. Without human help.
The flow:
All automated. No sales calls required.
Example: Loom onboarding. Install extension → Record first video → Send to someone → See how easy it was.
"Aha moment" in 2 minutes.
Sales-led onboarding:
Goal: Ensure successful implementation. Prove value. Expand usage.
The flow:
Highly manual. High-touch. Relationship-driven.
Example: Salesforce implementation.3-6 month project. Dedicated team. Training programs. Certification paths.
Success requires human involvement.
PLG social proof:
Focus on user volume and ease.
What works:
Signals: Lots of people use this. It's easy. It works.
Example: Canva homepage."100M+ users. 170+ countries. 5+ billion designs created."
Volume is the proof.
Sales-led social proof:
Focus on enterprise scale and results.
What works:
Signals: Serious companies trust us. We handle scale. We deliver results.
Example: SAP homepage."92% of Forbes Global 2000 companies."
Enterprise credibility.
What PLG should avoid:
"Enterprise-grade security" → Sounds heavy "Trusted by Fortune 500" → Not relatable
Complex implementation stories → Scary
What sales-led should avoid:
"10M users" → Volume doesn't signal quality for enterprise
Consumer review sites → Not enterprise buying criteria "So easy anyone can use it" → Sounds too simple
Match proof to motion.
PLG conversion model:
Land with individuals/small teams. Expand within company.
Pricing strategy:
Goal: Make it easy to start. Grow revenue through expansion.
Metrics that matter:
You win through volume, activation, and expansion.
Average deal size: $100-500/month starting. Grows to $1K-10K+ over time.
Sales efficiency: Very high. Minimal CAC. Strong payback.
Example: Slack. Free tier → Team plan ($8/user) → Business+ ($15/user) → Enterprise Grid (custom).
Start free. Expand as team grows. Self-serve until enterprise scale.
Sales-led conversion model:
Land with enterprise deals. Expand through additional modules/seats.
Pricing strategy:
Goal: Close large deals. Expand through renewal and cross-sell.
Metrics that matter:
You win through fewer, larger deals.
Average deal size: $50K-500K+ annually.
Sales efficiency: Lower. High CAC. Longer payback. But high LTV.
Example: Workday. Minimum contract $100K+. 12-month sales cycle. Custom pricing. Multi-year commitment.
No small deals. Only enterprise.
Hybrid can work if:
You have clear segmentation by deal size.
Small deals (<$10K/year): Self-serve PLG Large deals (>$50K/year): Sales-led
You route differently based on signals:
You have resources for both motions:
You keep the website paths separate:
Hybrid fails when:
You try to make same funnel work for both:
You don't have resources to do both well:
You confuse prospects with mixed messages:
Most companies should pick one primary motion.
If you're pre-$10M ARR: Pick PLG or sales-led. Go all-in.
If you're $50M+ ARR: You can afford both. But still need clear primary motion.
Some companies start PLG, move sales-led. Others start sales-led, add PLG.
Moving from PLG to sales-led:
Why: Average deal size too small. Churn too high. Need larger customers.
Website changes needed:
Risk: Alienating existing users. Reducing top-of-funnel volume.
Timeline: 6-12 months to transition fully.
Moving from sales-led to PLG:
Why: Sales doesn't scale. Want faster growth. Product is mature enough for self-serve.
Website changes needed:
Risk: Devaluing product. Creating support burden. Cannibalization of sales deals.
Timeline: 12-18 months to build true PLG capability.
Both transitions are hard. Neither is just a website change.
Requires: Product changes, pricing changes, team changes, process changes.
Website reflects the motion. Motion doesn't come from website.
Pick based on your product and market, not what's trendy.
PLG works when:
Sales-led works when:
Don't force PLG motion on sales-led product. Don't force sales process on PLG product.
Your website should amplify your natural motion, not fight it.
And remember: Great PLG companies still have sales teams (for expansion).Great sales-led companies still have great product (that's what you're selling).
The motion determines how you acquire customers. Website reflects that motion.
Design accordingly.


